|
BAGNASCO
La qualità della vita non dipende dal numero e dalla quantità delle esperienze enjoyable and rewarding excluding anything that seems a repetition heavy, tiring and boring: who said it, the archbishop of Genoa and president of the Episcopal Conference, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, at the end of the opening ceremony of the Ecclesiastical Court of the judicial region of Liguria.
"In fact - said the cardinal - is just the opposite. The different experiences are enriched only within a horizon of faith. When a person is faithful to its duties of marriage and work, then, becomes an even more enriching experience, but absolutely do not become the criterion of quality of life "
Earlier, commenting on the Report of the Judicial Vicar, Monsignor Paolo Rigon, the Cardinal said: "The cultural context in which we live, we breathe, is at the center, as is well known, the individual, his needs, with its emotions with its desires that seem to have become more and more the basis for judging the actual lives of both the individual and society that entails, rather than putting the person at the center, with its commitments to the decisions taken, the person as a key dimension of the constitutive relationship, not self referential. "
REPORT
|
A livello diocesano, delle 100 cases of first instance came in 2010 to the Ecclesiastical Court Ligure, 46 came from Genoa, 5 from Albenga, 15 from Chiavari, 16 from La Spezia, Savona 5, 9 and 4 from Tortona from Ventimiglia. The average age of applicants is 28-29 years and are required to share in the same way men and women. The data released today by the judicial vicar, Monsignor Paolo Rigon, also shows how to call for the cancellation were mainly used (14). Followed by professionals (9), home (4), teachers (7), unemployed (4), retired (3), workers (2) and other professionals (6). Requests for revocation are found more among those who were married between two and five years.
Among the reasons why marriages are declared invalid, said Monsignor Rigon still "three grounds for nullity are predominant in our courts of first instance: the first is that concerning the psychological and neurological as well as the inability to take seriously and fulfill the essential obligations of marriage to second place to the exclusion of children from the marriage and the exclusion of third place insolubility, which is the subject of separation and divorce if things go wrong. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment